Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Heroes of Desert Storm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. It looks like the participating editors disagree with the nominator's judgment about existing SIGCOV. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:03, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Heroes of Desert Storm

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is little more than a play-by-play recap of a made for TV Desert Storm doc which, so far as I can tell, won no awards and shows no SIGCOV. If not TNT'd, it may be a candidate for merging into an article about Desert Storm or films related to same. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Military, and Middle East. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 03:46, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Added sources that attest notabilty.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 10:19, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'd argue those fall under trivial/passing mentions and do not constitute SIGCOV. Just Another Cringy Username (talk) 20:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
A whole review in Variety, almost a paragraph in Devine’s book....hard not to call this significant coverage...and none of the books mentioning the film briefly makes trivial nor passing mention only, no, sorry, that’s simply not true. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:16, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Update: added review in LAT and other sources including NYT, which does seem to seal the deal.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 23:43, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:08, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep in view of significant coverage such as reviews in Variety, and LA Times as well as reliable book sources, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 22:55, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.