Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Decay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:24, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Decay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. WP:CRYSTAL also applies. Nikki♥311 03:55, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 03:56, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No signs of better satisfying the applicable notability guidelines, delete at best for now. SwisterTwister talk 07:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This pointless discussion comes up whenever a new stable or character debuts, sure we don't know for definite if they will even be there next month but it is extremely likely and right after debut is when the highest level of interest is going to be from people wanting to know about them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.8.58.79 (talk) 08:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, not notable as a team right now, their individual articles can cover it. MPJ-US 11:38, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep - This stupid discussion always comes up whenever a new stable or tag team forms, if the team does last a while and we delete it, it just makes more work to put it back up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.214.94.65 (talk) 15:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete in response to the IPs, WP:TOOSOON is real.LM2000 (talk) 09:29, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - definitely WP:TOOSOON, at best. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:07, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.