Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Baldies
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:30, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Baldies (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Seems like an unnotable street gang. Sources are pretty thin. Clarityfiend (talk) 18:58, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:35, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:35, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 19:35, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
- Comment. To be clear to anyone else looking for sources who ran into this same problem: this is NOT the same gang as The Baldies, also of Minnesota, who were an anti-racist skinhead group. See [1]. Gilded Snail (talk) 18:03, 10 April 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 06:42, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 06:42, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Unless someone makes a connection with the 80s Baldies (anti-racist skinheads) which seem plausibly notable, I don't see how the 50s-70s group is notable - I'm unable to find enough in my searches. Icewhiz (talk) 11:25, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Not WP:GNG Lubbad85 (☎) 17:03, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - as of now WP:GNG is not met. But if work is done and improves the article I am willing to change my !vote.BabbaQ (talk) 16:43, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.