Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SuperTux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was a keep‎. TLA (talk) 05:54, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SuperTux

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The game has many paragraph-long mentions in Linux guide books explaining its concept, such as 1 and 2, but I'm not seeing anything that goes into detail about the game. QuietCicada - Talk 15:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Software. QuietCicada - Talk 15:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article needs heavy cleanup, but this is a case of WP:SURMOUNTABLE. The game is clearly notable, having got reviews in Linux Voice, Free Software for Dummies, and PC Games World. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Antarctica-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The game is notable and a quick search on Google and DDG brings up some decent sources. Yes, it does need improvement, but remember WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. --StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 02:51, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There are plenty of RS to establish notability, there is another: Amiga Future 69, November/December 2007, p. 20 (review of the Amiga version). Pavlor (talk) 06:45, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:DELETIONISNOTCLEANUP Blitzfan51 speak to the manager — Preceding undated comment added 22:30, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.