Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spam Reader

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spam Reader

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Of no notable significance deserving of a Wikipedia page. There are also hints of advertising (first edit 86260199). The page was created when Wikipedia was first developing, and this article looks like it slipped through the cracks. dibbydib ^💬/_✏ 01:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Non-notable, pretty much an advertisement. The bottom 5 ELs, linking to the product's functionalities, makes this a clear case of an advert. Plus, the first reference is clearly dependent (fails WP:IS) and the second ref is in no way related to the subject. tLoM (The Lord of Math) (Message) 02:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 21:47, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.