Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soyo Oka
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Soyo Oka (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) No in-depth coverage on the individual in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. I don't see a particularly relevant redirect option. czar 06:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 06:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:52, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- I'd say delete or redirect to Super Mario Kart, the game she's most associated with. The only real reference we have on her is the one I linked in the talk page a while back. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 10:46, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete at best because, unless there's enough convincing to move to Super Mario Kart as mentioned above, there's nothing to suggest a solidly independently notable article. SwisterTwister talk 05:47, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. She isn't notable enough to warrant a page on Wikipedia, though she's still more notable than some other VGM composers with articles here. DrDevilFX (talk) 17:48, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.