Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shmarya Rosenberg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:44, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Shmarya Rosenberg

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bio of a media blogger. I do not see this as notable. The RS used in the article mostly are about the topics he blogs rather than him. This leaves one NYT profile as a source. I don't think this is enough to establish notability. Joe407 (talk) 09:31, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Joe407 (talk) 09:35, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. Joe407 (talk) 09:35, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. Joe407 (talk) 09:35, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

So, what do you suggest, to move it to "Failed Messiah"? Ajnem (talk) 13:22, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Article needs cleaning up, but detailed profiles, several years apart, in The New York Times and The Forward (the latter of which was also printed in Ha'aretz[1]), both talking about the person as well as the blog, equals notability. --Arxiloxos (talk) 19:43, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Scope and breadth of coverage justifies notability and merits retention. Alansohn (talk) 20:00, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Enough WP:RS and he's definitely WP:N to prove importance. IZAK (talk) 11:08, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, although I could also live with having it moved to "Failed Messiah", Ajnem (talk) 18:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.