Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharpen
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Sharpening. Tone 18:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sharpen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I was researching image sharpening and I found this instead. The eclipse plugin does not appear to be notable. The github repo has only 317 stars and a cursory search does not show RS or books about this particular plugin so I think it's not notable by WP:NSOFT Wqwt (talk) 17:42, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Wqwt (talk) 17:42, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect back to Sharpening as it used to be. A google search for "sharpen ide plugin" and "sharpen eclipse plugin" returns very, very little (in fact, pretty much the only return of relevance I found were stack overflow discussions from 2011-2012, around the time this "article" was formed and nothing beyond that). I'd agree with the nominator regarding no notability and the article title is better served in its original state. Bungle (talk • contribs) 20:08, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
- Redirect to Sharpening. Demonstrable lack of notability. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.