Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sex/Absurd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 19:23, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sex/Absurd

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Film currently being produced of questionable notability. The only references provided are Facebook, Etsy and IMDB with little that's concrete. None of the actors listed as appearing in the film have articles on Wikipedia and the director and author are also listed as actors. In all it smells much like an NN local project. role^player 23:34, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note the article creator is Jannajude (talk · contribs) and one of the actors appearing in the film is listed as Janna Jude Brown, so there's a potential conflict of interest here to boot. Oh and it's an orphan too. But neither or those are automatic reasons to delete on their own, just thought I'd mention them. -- role^player 23:45, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources, does not look like any will appear, so fails WP:GNG and WP:NF. Monty ₈₄₅ 23:48, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Notability has not yet been established for this film, according to either general or topical notability guidelines. I was unable to locate any independent, reliable sources that could be used to support the article, however, noted that the plot was a direct copy/paste from the FB page. Cind.amuse 00:28, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. While willing to accept in good faith that this may actually be filming, it has not generated any coverage in reliable sources, and would seem to curently fail WP:V. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:36, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no reliable sources, no evidence of meeting WP:GNG. --Kinu ^t/_c 20:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.