Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Cordingley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:50, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Cordingley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't feel there are enough sources to indicate notability other than local newspapers and a brief meeting with a notable person on a TV programme. They fail under WP:GNG and WP:ARTIST. (As an aside, I have flagged concerns that the image used by a local newspaper may not have been released under a CC licence, as has been indicated) Nick Moyes (talk) 13:07, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:37, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:42, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Lacks substantial coverage in independent, reliable sources. The Express and Star's coverage of her wedding is the height of triviality. Mduvekot (talk) 15:59, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom - GretLomborg (talk) 15:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not notable. Seaweed (talk) 19:14, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.