Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saeta (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:17, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Saeta (band)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There's some (local) coverage but not enough to add up to WP:BAND or WP:GNG. Sending WP:APPNOTE to Michig, Richhoncho, Catlemur, Twas Now. Boleyn (talk) 19:01, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 19:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as my searches found nothing better than a few local mentions. SwisterTwister talk 19:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 19:40, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I'm highly sympathetic to groups trying to maintain their own thing outside of the standard music industry, but the fact still remains that without reliable source coverage what is there to talk about in the article? I agree with the above arguments. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 05:41, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.