Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/STORIS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. bd2412 T 23:48, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

STORIS

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a notable company, does not meet the requirements of WP:NCORP. No evidence the company has received significant coverage from reliable sources. Rusf10 (talk) 21:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 22:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 22:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 22:09, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Existing sources are press releases. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 23:33, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reads like a brochure for the company. scope_creep^Talk 12:08, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no coverage outside of a small industry with few reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 20:32, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: An article originally by WP:SPA User:STORIS, subsequently developed by another WP:SPA. An edit summary of "Updated our Product Summary and added more tradeshows we attend" indicates WP:COI and uncited blather about "highly scalable technology" and "operational efficiencies" is fit for a brochureware site but not here. Searches are not finding better than routine announcement coverage, insufficient for WP:NCORP. AllyD (talk) 09:52, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.