Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SIMCom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 23:58, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SIMCom

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. Appears to be a subsidiary company, but the parent company doesn't even have an article (otherwise I would have simply redirected). Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 23:47, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 23:47, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 23:47, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:19, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not enough independent sourcing - I couldn't find much coverage outside of press releases or rote quarterly reporting.Citing (talk) 18:40, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Cannot find non-trivial sources for the company to establish notability. Existing article references are either trivial or the company's own website. –Erakura^(talk) 19:23, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG, WP:ORG and WP:CORPDEPTH Wm335td (talk) 20:58, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.