Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Runnymede Hotel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Participants concluded that the reviews of this hotel are insufficient to confer notability. ✗plicit 01:39, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Runnymede Hotel

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Coverage I found is mainly about a hotel with the same name in Malaysia. LibStar (talk) 01:07, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. SL93 (talk) 01:22, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hotel served as expected as a hotel. Nothing notable here. BD2412 T 02:10, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Multiple reviews show notability. The article should be moved to The Runnymede on Thames. Recent reviews use the new name. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 03:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Hotel reviews in hotel industry publications or travel guides that provide reviews of numerous run-of-the-mill hotels should be given exceedingly sparse weight. BD2412 T 06:13, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:53, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's a hotel that exists, and possibly a decent one to stay at, but nothing really notable. LizardJr8 (talk) 02:49, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Reviews and profiles are part and parcel for the hotel industry, without which most wouldn't survive. There's nothing to suggest this place is actually notable and not just a nice hotel. HighKing 15:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.