Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RobOps

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RobOps

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOTNEO. If anything, this is a thinly-veiled advertisement for a conference slated for 2022. I don't see enough coverage of this concept to pass WP:GNG. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom, searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not finding the sigcov either (t · c) buidhe 16:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sigcov are referenced at: ^[1], ^[2] and ^[3] These sources meet WP:GNG (Independent, Secondary). Topic also provides structural use along the lines of DevOps & WinOps Wickedwiki2 (talk) 17:38, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per nom, comments above and MOS:NEO. --John B123 (talk) 18:08, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nomination, NOTNEO and fails GNG JW 1961^Talk 22:54, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't see how this passes GNG. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: not notable Megan B.... ^{It’s all coming to me} till the end of time 22:44, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Heartmusic678 (talk) 11:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete insufficient sourcing to meet GNG. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] ttps://arc.aiaa.org/doi/pdf/10.2514/6.2014-1870

[2] ttps://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ROBOPS-Approaching-a-Holistic-and-Unified-Interface-Jaekel-Brunner/e5e14263571cb7b03c198e2c8436bf49fc2cd9e3

[3] ttps://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2016-2474

[1]

[2]

[3]