Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RedAwning Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:54, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RedAwning Group

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. Coverage is either in passing, or comes from press releases and their reprints/rewrites/WP:ROUTINE start up news. Yet another WP:CORPSPAM created by an undisclosed paid for editor. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:47, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:32, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found -- what comes up is passing mentions, routine notices and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.