Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rakesh Khurana
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 02:10, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Rakesh Khurana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Questionable notability, minimal sourcing. An IP tried to nominate this. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 22:04, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Passes WP:PROF criterion 5 with a named chair. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:42, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Phil Bridger (talk) 12:42, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep, speedy close. Named chair at Harvard, multiple scholarly books from major university presses. Unarguably passes WP:PROF. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:18, 12 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Snow keep per WP:PROF#C1 (many highly cited papers in Google scholar, three with over 100 cites) and #C5 (the named chair). —David Eppstein (talk) 00:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.