Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raise Data Recovery

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:06, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Raise Data Recovery

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Previous version was deleted A7/G11. This version is, to the best of my recollection, an identical recreation. Barring Adam9007's removal of the list of different versions, it still is. WP:ADVERT of a non-notable product created by an WP:SPA sock of another SPA. Cabayi (talk) 14:24, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 14:24, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I previously listed this for speedy deletion with an incorrect code (although it had already been deleted under A7 previously). This is just using Wikipedia for promotion of a non-notable piece of software. There is nothing in the article that even tries to establish WP:GNG. Lithopsian (talk) 14:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: A WP:SPA article describing a software product. The brief Softpedia review referenced in the article establishes existence but is insufficient for notability, and my searches are finding nothing better. Fails WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 16:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. There is nothing to suggest this is anything more than an attempt to use Wikipedia for advertising. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:07, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.