Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RISE Editor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 06:32, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RISE Editor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't find that this meets WP:N or a good WP:ATD. Not my general field of expertise, so I would be interested in seeing what others think. Boleyn (talk) 11:56, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previous WP:PROD candidate, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 14:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. I couldn't find evidence that it meets WP:N -- not even close. It's mentioned on various websites that offer downloads of the software, but nothing close to in-depth coverage by a WP:RS. The article doesn't do itself any favors: it makes a lot of claims, but nothing is cited to a reliable source. The only citation is to an interview, which doesn't seem to mention RISE. Larry/Traveling_Man (talk) 00:01, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I'm finding download links and some forums where people are asking questions about how to troubleshoot this, but no coverage at all, let alone in WP:RS. -- asilvering (talk) 03:52, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.