Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qoole (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Quake mods#Quake II. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 23:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Qoole

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I would've PRODed if not for the 2006 AfD which emphasizes something since even they deleted it, nine of this amounts to actual notability and substance and I've found nothing at all for actual convincing. SwisterTwister talk 18:57, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Quake_mods#Quake_II. Rationale copied from talk page (with a few changes) after my explained redirection was reverted without explanation: "Not sure what there is to discuss. If you remove the patently unreliable sources, which I just did, we're left with next to no sourced information. We don't keep separate articles for topics about which we have (as I originally said and linked) a 'dearth of substantial and in-depth, dedicated reliable sources'. Personal websites don't pass muster but there are plenty of vetted video game-specific sites at WP:VG/RS, just none of them mention Qoole in any depth. Also redirection is not deletion and Qoole is mentioned at the Quake mods page. Feel free to expand on the topic from reliable, secondary sources there." czar 21:25, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Quake_mods#Quake_II. Fine with me! --DanielPharos (talk) 22:59, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 01:11, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Quake_mods#Quake_II as the most appropriate spot. -- Dane ^talk 00:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Quake mods#Quake II as a valid search term. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.