Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pratip Munshi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:42, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pratip Munshi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotionally toned article on a non-notable mother-of-pearl artist. It seems to be part of a possible walled garden on various family members of the Mushi/Munsi family. No indication from the current sourcing nor in a BEFORE search that this artist passes GNG nor meets the criteria for NARTIST. All I found online were WP mirrors. Bringing it here for the community to decide. Netherzone (talk) 20:44, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists, Visual arts, India, and West Bengal. Netherzone (talk) 20:44, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
DELETE Not notable enough at all for Wikipedia standards. Jaunpurzada (talk) 22:05, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: per nom. Fails WP:NARTIST. All I can find online are trivial mentions in blogs and mirrors of this article, so they also fail WP:NBASIC. C F A 💬 23:14, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Page reads as WP:PROMO. I do not find any source on the subject notable for originating any significant new concept, or created well-known work. RangersRus (talk) 13:22, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:NARTIST and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:40, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per above, and basically as I haven’t seen any reliable sources. Bearian (talk) 15:10, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This artist doesn't seem famous. Their work isn't widely recognized and there's hardly any reliable info about them online. Seems like a clear case of someone trying to boost their profile. Waqar💬 16:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.