Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poq

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article with almost no indication of significance,. That it's used by a small number of retailers just means "it exists" The awards are minor (and 2 of the 5 aren't even awards). The references are either PR or just notice-- or , like the Forbes, just mentions in a few words as one of many startups in an area. . DGG ( talk ) 19:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 09:48, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. The venture funding isn't enough for presumed notability. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:44, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as detailed company information like this is only suitable for their own company website, not a formal encyclopedia. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ _Talk 16:09, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.