Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phrase (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Phrase (software)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability does not appear to be established by cited sources. Guardian article only quotes the CEO of the company that makes this software, and isn't about the software. The article was created by the CEO. Beland (talk) 03:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Beland (talk) 03:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 03:54, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Blatant Promotion of a website. Based on Routine. Priyanjali singh (talk) 06:15, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No RS, mostly references to their own corporate publications. Deathlibrarian (talk) 10:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Promotion of a website and its commercial offerings. No RS. -- Whiteguru (talk) 11:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Under its former name PhaseApp, I found a few reliable sources which talk about the site: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] and [6]. With these, the article is good enough to pass WP:NSOFT. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 16:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: to allow discussion of sources provided in the last comment
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 22:47, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: While the Techbeacon Article [7] seemed somewhat of a breakthrough nature and would appeal to a wide audience, the rest of the article resembled more of a Google or Yelp summation, nothing that noteworthy other than the first article. TruthLover123 (talk) 05:23, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 16:13, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.