Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peyton Meyer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Mr.Z-man 02:11, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peyton Meyer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject of this article fails WP:NACTOR. To date he has only had a single, very minor role (3 episodes) as a character in one series, and appeared in another program as himself. WP:NACTOR requires "significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions" but, to date, he hasn't come close to that. Nor does he have a fanbase. According to the article he will be a main character in a series to be aired sometime in 2014 but that's a little WP:CRYSTAL and doesn't establish notability now. In the event that he becomes notable as a result of the future role then the article can be recreated when the time is appropriate. AussieLegend (✉) 12:10, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:30, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:30, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete For now, currently a stock player in the Disney sitcom repertory, and yes, likely to become more in GMW, but for now an article without much to go on. Another point; 'love interest' should never be used in an article describing a tween show. Nate • (chatter) 16:17, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now - TBA Disney star for now with no major role in either series it seems yet so I can't even begin to recommend redirecting. Google News and other searches provided pretty much the same, news articles (with some not-so-reliable or significant blogs) about the series with mentions in sentences or paragraphs about him but nothing solid yet. It could be taken as a good sign that there's some good coverage now but it's still a crystal ball. No prejudice, as always, towards a future article or userfying. SwisterTwister talk 04:28, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now, per the above - subject to date does not yet meet WP:ENT. Redirects are cheap and I guess I would not be opposed to one since there is some coverage for his role on the upcoming Girl Meets World show, but I agree that it's still rather crystallball-ish. Gong show 07:52, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.