Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Ramsay Watt Boyd
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:08, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Peter Ramsay Watt Boyd (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Beloved radiologist, but still just a radiologist, despite the huge amount of fangushing in the article. Corvus cornix 22:40, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete A7 (bio). I concur, there's a whole lot of fanguishing in the article, but really, what makes him a notable radiologist? Did he pioneer some new technique? Did he demonstrate how to x-ray a human from 40 feet using standard equipment? Without concrete information, I can't justify a keep, and I'm going speedy because this just says he's prominent and butters him up - it doesn't demonstrate or assert notability. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 23:08, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The article was created by User:Jrwboyd, probably a relative. Corvus cornix 23:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletions. —Espresso Addict 16:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Head of a hospital's X-ray department doesn't seem to be enough to confer notability. Google searching fails to find other achievements. Willing to change my mind if other material uncovered, eg in what fashion he 'served the Trinidad Government from 1960 to 1983'. Espresso Addict 16:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Possible hoax. Stifle (talk) 20:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.