Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PerspectX
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:26, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- PerspectX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Generic software shop. Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creepTalk 21:36, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:45, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing 22:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.