Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PerimeterX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:52, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

PerimeterX

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an early stage tech startup. Significant RS coverage not found. Article cited to passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP, or routine funding news. Created by Special:Contributions/JonathanBentz currently indef blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Being one of "20 Cybersecurity Startups to Watch in 2017" is an insufficient claim of significance. Instead, it strongly suggests that it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia entry. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:25, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTSPAM. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:51, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Naming notable topics in an article does not indicate that the article itself is notable, per WP:NOTINHERITED. Per TonyBallioni's point, I would not consider press releases about raised funds to pass WP:NOTSPAM. WP:CORPDEPTH is also failed.--SamHolt6 (talk) 03:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:46, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:46, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:46, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete promotional article of non notable company founded 3 years ago and lacking significant coverage in independent sources –Ammarpad (talk) 05:58, 29 November 2017 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.