Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Penteo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. I'm going with "soft delete" because although three editors have participated, none of them suggesting keeping the article, there's also not a general air of "yes, we should unquestionably delete this" from two of them. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:09, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Penteo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A single-sentence stub tagged for notability since...deep breath...August 2006. WP:BEFORE was inconclusive, which is why I'm taking it here rather than prodding -- it doesn't seem impossible there might be an article buried in here -- but man, is that a bad look, and the 'inconclusive' in question is leaning rather 'delete with prejudice'. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 05:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 05:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 05:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 05:59, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and WP:SIGCOV. I found zero newspaper articles or book references. Bearian (talk) 01:18, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: The version that was live prior to this edit in January 2021 was a lot more than a single-sentence stub, but did lack references and contain some promotional claims. The notability tag that was added under that edit appears to have been mistakenly backdated to August 2006, the date when the article was originally created? AllyD (talk) 14:55, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.