Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pentaho (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) b uidhe 09:41, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pentaho

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no evidence that the handful of awards Pentaho won, it's only claim to notability, are notable themselves. I see no evidence it's otherwise notable. StarM 13:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. StarM 13:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. StarM 13:55, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:25, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: oh weird, totally didn't realize it was a second nom. My nom statement still stands, and wow, things have changed since then. StarM 02:01, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The article is decently sourced, and while some of the RS citations are questionable for notability purposes, there's enough coverage here overall. Modernponderer (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:48, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Per books on the books link. The WP:VAGUEWAVE nomination seems to have totally ignored these; and it is required to account for these during WP:BEFORE. Thankyou.Djm-leighpark (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I did, they still don't seem to establish notability. The company exists and published books. We may disagree, and this may ultimately be kept, but I completely disagree that you take issue with my nomination when your deletion comment doesn't even address the substance of the issues I saw StarM 13:38, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yup we disagree. VAGUEWAVE nominate deserves a VAGUEWAVE keep in my book. To me it 'seems' they establish notability.Djm-leighpark (talk) 14:08, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This primary topic is the Pentaho software and not the company. There are sufficient references in the article that contain Independent Content and meet the criteria for notability. Topic passes GNG. HighKing 11:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.