Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peckhammer TV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Cirt (talk) 15:05, 30 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Peckhammer TV

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've requested the creation of a deletion discussion for this page at Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_deletion. A speedy deletion template (G4) was removed, so discussion is needed. The article appears to reproduce the content of another article (Peckhammer.blip.tv) which was previously deleted pursuant to a deletion discussion. The article contains numerous references, as noted by the editor who removed the G4 template -- but none of the referenced secondary sources actually appear to mention the article subject itself, so the notability problems (which were the reason for the original deletion) don't seem to be resolved. If an administrator follows up on my request, the deletion discussion should appear at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peckhammer TV. 67.127.57.254 (talk) 23:01, 21 July 2010 (UTC) ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 09:33, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. —Dbratland (talk) 19:23, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I have added valid references to this page demonstrating notability of the subject material. Souris40 (talk) 19:46, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the broadcaster is notable. I'm satisfied with the sources and it gets a lot of google hits. --Biker Biker (talk) 20:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes notability. Rgds, --Trident13 (talk) 20:24, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The SoundRider article, plus the number of YouTube views, plus the penumbra cast by a large number of lesser value sources added together meet notability.--Dbratland (talk) 05:04, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.