Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Option consommateurs
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn. ✗plicit 12:21, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Option consommateurs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
there do not appear to be any third party sources DGG ( talk ) 10:48, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 10:53, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Many, many hits in Gnews in French about them, it's the Quebec consumer watchdog. Oaktree b (talk) 18:45, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The simplest of Google News searches find 1,800 hits - 28 today alone. It's not the watchdog though - that's the Office de la protection du consommateur. It's a well known group - can User:DGG describe what kind of WP:BEFORE they did, and perhaps withdraw this nomination. Nfitz (talk) 21:52, 7 February 2022 (UTC)
- My error -- withdrawn. But none of this was in the article, and none of is yet in the article. I assume those who found the sources will add them. DGG ( talk ) 06:33, 8 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: expanding on the previous comment, the current version of the article is worthy of WP:TNT. Geschichte (talk) 20:13, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.