Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Open value network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 10:14, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Open value network

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

promotion, base on one scientific paper. DGG ( talk ) 09:28, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:22, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete.unless very widely cited, nope. Legacypac (talk) 07:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:50, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:51, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It seems a marketing tagline for Sensorica, circa 2011 through 2013 or so. Long past time to delete, since no evidence the term ever caught on with anyone else. W Nowicki (talk) 18:15, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.