Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/OpenLiteSpeed
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 14:20, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- OpenLiteSpeed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- @Kaceyyyy: Queried speedy delete as advertisement Anthony Appleyard (talk) 21:20, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 13:27, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I did a Google search and can only find how to articles about configuring the tool - but no significant coverage on the tool itself, or why it's notable. Fails WP:RS TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 22:03, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: the only sources I can find which are remotely independent are this and this which are no good for establishing software notability because they are just how-to articles, and Wikipedia isn't a manual. No indication of major reviews or the like, as I say, other than those two, most of the sources I can find are self-published. DrStrauss talk 08:59, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. I also can't find anything in the way of WP:RS. Appears to be part of a suite of promotional articles (LiteSpeed Web Server, LiteSpeed Technologies) created by a cluster of WP:SPAs to promote the product and company. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:02, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.