Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nickelodeon-India

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Aside from nominator, unanimous consensus for Keep, with no objections to delete. All those that commented in the AFD, other than the nominator, expressed viewpoints that the page should be cleaned up and fixed, and one editor stated he had done so during the AFD. -- Cirt (talk) 02:50, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nickelodeon-India

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This Page is not well written, the information it has is not properly applied. Anirudh Emani (talk) 07:13, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Consider improving it by searching for references. Nickelodeon is a major company, and that shouldn't pose much trouble. --Sigma 7 (talk) 22:48, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I think we should improve it. KuwarOnline ^Talk 05:36, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as an obviously notable subject. I have removed the marketing bollocks-speak from the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:11, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Clearly notable. Nominator is correct that the page is not well written, but that is an argument for editing, not deletion. --MelanieN (talk) 03:15, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.