Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nhttpd

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nhttpd

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable software. No evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources and none found in a WP:BEFORE search. Tagged for notability and sourcing issues for over a decade. Jfire (talk) 03:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Jfire (talk) 03:04, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot find any independent sources, either. The article is sourced entirely to documentation supplied by the inventor. No-one else has apparently ever documented this. Uncle G (talk) 08:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I couldn't find any independent sources as well. PaulT2022 (talk) 01:01, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, this article was PROD'd in the past so Soft Deletion is not an option.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - There's one article about a vulnerability [1] but nothing significant. --StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 03:04, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.