Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New folk media

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Chetsford (talk) 02:11, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New folk media

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for 13 years for no sources and that is because there isn't any available. While using copyrighted material is nothing new, there doesn't seem to be anybody that uses this term to describe it. Apart from Index of aesthetics articles, no article points to this page. Mattg82 (talk) 00:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Mattg82 (talk) 00:50, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The idea this article refers to may be real, but I can't find any evidence that it's called "new folk media". Détournement and culture jamming appear to be terms more likely to be used instead. Since we already have articles about these concepts and the term "new folk media" cannot be sourced, this article should be deleted rather than redirected. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:56, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:27, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a joke. The author, on his user page says his name is B. Leonard Zelig. Leonard Zelig is the protagonist of Zelig a "nondescript enigma". Vexations (talk) 11:43, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacking verification in reliable sources, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 00:33, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.