Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Necrobotics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. czar 05:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Necrobotics

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is essentially synopsis of a single academic paper, with all secondary sources being trivial mentions thereof. Please finish AfD submission. 70.172.183.203 (talk) 22:15, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Completing nomination on behalf of IP editor--above text is copied from their request at WT:AFD. I have no opinion of my own at this time. --Finngall ^talk 19:08, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Biology-related deletion discussions. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 19:10, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The subject is clearly notable. Google Scholar gives 27 papers and these are not trivial mentions. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 19:37, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:29, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Plenty of good papers in Gscholar [1] gives a decent introduction to the concept. Oaktree b (talk) 21:06, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: significant coverage in academic literature, including secondary aggregators such as IEEE. Owen× ☎ 15:18, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.