Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/National Anti-Vivisection Alliance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 23:23, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

National Anti-Vivisection Alliance

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Way too complicated for PROD. Article created by org founder, who got some press when he was jailed. Website has been inactive since then per the article. According to one of the only independent sources I can find, it really was just a one man "coalition". The article is currently being used to discuss other animal controversies, but it isn't clear that NAVA had any large roll in these protests. I am unable to find evidence via BEFORE that this meets WP:ORG. Star Mississippi 15:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 15:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 15:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Star Mississippi 15:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 17:46, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:20, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:ORG. Only 2 Gnews hits. LibStar (talk) 23:54, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete most of the sources are either primary, poor quality (e.g. WP:DAILYMIRROR), or don't actually mention the organization at all (e.g. the BBC article). Fails WP:ORG. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.