Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naked for a Cause

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:49, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Naked for a Cause

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; an charity initiative that distributed "celebrity nude calendars" with no significant notability. The sources in the article are primarily promotional. Allied45 (talk) 01:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related page (this an article on the actual calendar that was distributed):

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Allied45 (talk) 01:58, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 00:42, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DannyS712 (talk) 06:57, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - agree with nominator that lacks notability contemporary or lasting, with a bit of routine or promotional coverage and nothing else. Aspirex (talk) 22:55, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect and merge to McGrath_Foundation#McGrath Foundation initiatives with due weight, both articles, ie, only a couple of sentences each. Neither article is notable in its own right, but could be a fan or cult following search term, and are of possible respective interest. Aoziwe (talk) 06:28, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of organization-related deletion discussions. Aoziwe (talk) 06:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:08, 17 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:32, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Doesn't look like a merge is appropriate, as this benefits, but is not an initiative by, McGrath, as far as I can tell. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 04:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOTINHERETED; attractive people in the buff do not confer any notability they may have upon these topics. Madness ^Darkness 15:14, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.