Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nagarro

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Compelling source analysis not challenged Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:53, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nagarro

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCOMPANY with virtually all source being industry adjacent, and potentially non-independent. No claim of notability. Article has little encyclopedic value, with promo wordings and focus on company defined milestones which may fail WP:UNDUE. Melmann 15:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Melmann 15:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Needs to be less promotional and more encyclopediac. It belongs in a larger article about Allgeier SE. Omniscientmoose42 (talk) 18:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This company is notable due to the work this organization does in Gurugram - all of those sources are independent and not industry adjacent. However, I can see how the first half of the article may seem promotional (when I worked on this article, I looked at other companies to see how they define their page structures). Regarding the merge recommendation, I did some quick search on the company and it has announced in the press that it is carving out from Allgeier SE. So, merging it now may be counterproductive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amiwikieditor (talk • contribs) 09:18, 27 October 2020 (UTC) . Sorry, forgot to sign it. Amiwikieditor (talk) 10:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please post links to references you believe meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing 19:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing 19:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think the article has significant coverage for its initiatives to establish notability and all the references on the page are independent, third-party sources. The article seems neutral enough to me; some scope of improvement exists but not enough to support deletion. Westminster88 (talk) 08:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The applicable guideline is WP:NCORP. Please post links to the WP:THREE references that you believe meet the criteria for establishing notability, especially WP:CORPDEPTH and WP:ORGIND. Note that PR, announcements, mentions-in-passing fail the criteria. HighKing 17:07, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per HighKing. --KartikeyaS (talk) 19:19, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion is leaning delete but a bit more input would be helpful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 08:36, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Due to lacking multiple in-depth reliable sources and therefore failing WP:GNG. Along with not meeting WP:NCORP. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:03, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The company has adequate notable, in-depth references like: https://www.manufacturingtodayindia.com/sectors/5206-infinityqs-opens-new-subsidiary-in-india-to-support-global-expansion, https://autotechreview.com/news/nagarro-lithium-urban-technologies-electric-vehicle-employee-commute-2019-green-mobility-zero-emission, https://www.timesnownews.com/auto/features/article/this-it-company-has-launched-an-ev-fleet-for-its-employees-in-delhi-ncr/481150, https://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/news/2016/12/14/software-company-with-ties-to-phoenix-acquired-by.html. These references are not just trivial mentions and are not industry adjacent, but are reliable sources independent of the subject. With that, I think it meets WP:GNG .Buzztrack (talk) 06:23, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The applicable guideline is WP:NCORP. None of the references you've linked to meet the criteria for establishing notability. NCORP specifically excludes announcements and press releases. All of the articles you've references are one of the other. This from Manufacturing Today India is entirely based on this Press Release, fails WP:ORGIND. This from Auto Tech Review is based on an announcement and launch which was also covered by other publications, relies entirely on information/quotations from the company, also fails WP:ORGIND. This from Times Now News is based on the same announcement as the previous reference and fails WP:ORGIND for the same reasons. Finally, this from Biz Journals is entirely based on this company announcement and relies entirely on information provided by the company, also fails WP:ORGIND. Please read WP:ORGIND and WP:CORPDEPTH. HighKing 18:43, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.