Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mubarak Bala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Irreligion in Nigeria. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:03, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mubarak Bala

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:BLP1E criterion 1, Mr. Bala does not meet our notability guidelines. Perhaps a redirect to Irreligion in Nigeria would be in order, but he is not notable for his own article. Go Phightins! 03:36, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is all that can be said about Mr Bala, then I'm forced to agree. If, conversely, more can be said about Mr Bala, then that content should be added to the article. DS (talk) 03:38, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Atheism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:02, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Merge or/and Redirect: I believe his story will be very useful for a larger article on minority religions (I am assuming not believing in God is also a religion) in Nigeria. Definitely not significant enough for a standalone article. There is no biggie in sending an Atheist to a rehab center in Nigeria sef. Darreg (talk) 00:14, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge or/and Redirect is the best option.193.164.114.35 (talk) 14:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as the information is valid, but there isn't enough about the individual to justify a standalone article. MezzoMezzo (talk) 04:05, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.