Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Micromort (software)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 19:45, 17 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Micromort (software)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While there is coverage, it seems to sufficient WP:DEPTH to justify an article (largely "we used this software"). Allan Nonymous (talk) 16:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Software. Allan Nonymous (talk) 16:54, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Heisey & Fuller is a primary source, while the book source appears to mention the software only once. — xDanielx ^T/_C\^R 16:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It is hard to find sources as the micromort is a common unit in the field. Aaron Liu (talk) 15:32, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there does not appear to be a way to write more than a couple sentence article about the subject. Brandon (talk) 16:15, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines by not providing enough independent, reliable sources that cover the software in detail --Moarnighar (talk) 11:10, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.