Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MattyBRaps

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 02:17, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MattyBRaps

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing malformed nomination by IP 219.90.106.167. Rationale copied from talk page: This kid is not notable. There are not substantial sources to justify an article. Having made it on BB's Social 50 for one week when he was 9 doesn't indicate notability now. Redirect to MattyB with the "not to be confused" tag at that page in place. I have no opinion, other than that the proposed redirect is probably not the best solution (also noting that MattyB redirects here and not to Matty B, which is what the IP meant to link to). ansh 666 09:25, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 11:10, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - plenty of sources, and a notable person. Seems like a bad faith nomination to me. Patient Zero^talk 18:02, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have doubts whether the "Social 50" meets what NMUSIC considers "charting." GNG is so low a bar, embarrassing articles like this convince me we need stricter criteria, especially for BLPs. Chris Troutman (talk) 19:56, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Keep – The subject has received ongoing significant coverage in reliable sources; qualifies for an article per meeting WP:BASIC. Some source examples: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] (select "mehr..." on page to view all). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:51, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.