Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Simonds
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to List of Honorverse characters. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 14:20, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Matthew Simonds (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Created in 2005, this article on a profoundly non-notable minor fictional character unfairly occupies a title that happens to be the name of a number of real people who have more of a chance of being notable than this character ever will. Abductive (talk) 01:04, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | Talk 01:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge/Redirect to List of Honorverse characters, not notable to stand on its own. Zombie Hunter Smurf (talk) 01:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, that's a good reason. Delete this and make Matthew Simonds (Honorverse) a redirect to List of Honorverse characters, into which this article may be histmerged if appropriate. Jclemens (talk) 03:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I've read the series several times over and I couldn't place this guy. Very, very minor character. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:27, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above; non-notable, yada, yada. This is another walled-garden of fancruft; same authors as the 1632 garden, too. Same SEO consultant? Cheers, Jack Merridew 04:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to List of Honorverse characters. Edward321 (talk) 23:26, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.