Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matt Johnson (neuroscientist)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 15:26, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Matt Johnson (neuroscientist)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not my area of expertise, but am struggling to find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Seemingly fails WP:BIO and WP:NACADEMIC. Edwardx (talk) 10:13, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No objection. On further examination, can’t find any scholarly articles produced. If consensus is he doesn’t meet standards, there’ll be no contestion from me. Cheers, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 10:43, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 10:47, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 10:47, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 10:47, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Consumer neuroscience. His book on the topic and the fact that numerous other workers in the area have thanked him for his support suggests he's at least halfway notable, certainly enough for a mention in that other article. The Forbes articles (specially "How Stories Can Impact Your Taste In Food", which is basically all about his book), go quite a long way towards conferring notability, whatever h-index he may have. Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:29, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Being quoted a few times does not confer notability, and I don't see any signification works or contributions which would warrant a page for the subject. --PhobosIkaros ✉ 17:35, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - academic and administrator at a business institute, not a scholar. Bearian (talk) 20:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.