Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mashin' Duck Records
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 16:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Mashin' Duck Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable record label. The article also hardly even deals with the label itself, in fact it most of it seems devoted to elaborate on early Eminem demo tapes, such as "Fuckin' Backstabber" and "Biterphopia", while adding plenty of ridiculous and unattributed claims in the mix as well. Please note that similar discussions have already been conducted on this matter at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soul Intent and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fuckin’ Backstabber/Soul Intent. Do U(knome)? yes...or no 19:05, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 19:21, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this record label. Joe Chill (talk) 21:33, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect This is definitely WP:COATRACK for anything related to Eminem and Proof. This label by itself has no notability to warrant its own article. As with Soul Intent, it should be redirected to Eminem#Early life and first releases. Angryapathy (talk) 21:35, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability as a separate article. No sense in an obscure redirect, this is not 'Soul Intent' which is already obscure enough. Polargeo (talk) 15:22, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.