Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maple T.A.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. With no further discussion of the sources provided, I'm closing this as no consensus. Before renominating, consider whether it can be merged to the company's article instead. SoWhy 12:01, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Maple T.A.

Maple T.A. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the notability guidelines for web content(this being a web-based program). The only source offered is the website of the company that created it. I could find no sources offering in-depth coverage of this software. It was tagged with an A7 deletion request(importance) in September but it was removed. The proposed CSD was contested with the explanation "This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because this page is intended to be an information source about a product (Maple T.A.). This was the first bit of information created for this page and more content is to be created in the future." which is a promotional purpose- also suggesting that the page creator has a COI. 331dot (talk) 14:35, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

• If you are looking for articles on Maple T.A., they can be provided. Am I to include them as reference, or here, or both? RochelleAngyal (talk) 14:40, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Either would be satisfactory. They will need to be independent reliable sources(please review if you haven't yet). 331dot (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Actually, here would be preferable, as you should not directly edit articles about your company or its products per the conflict of interest policy. 331dot (talk) 14:42, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:50, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:50, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

• Here is an article from a digital testing consultant in the Netherlands discussing digital testing with Maple T.A. Additional academic research publications are coming.RochelleAngyal (talk) 18:22, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

• Conference presentation from TU Delft on their assessment practices. RochelleAngyal (talk) 18:25, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

References

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —MRD2014 ( T / C ) 02:39, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.