Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mankind (video game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn clearly my search was faulty. No reason to drag this out. StarM 02:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mankind (video game)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

While searching is a challenge due to the name, I can find no evidence that this was a notable video game. This is the best source, and it's definitely not up to sourcing standards, and this one even says we're unlikely to have heard of its operator. StarM 15:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. StarM 15:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. StarM 15:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The article in its current state doesn't really show anything towards the notability. However, I found several reliable sources discussing it non-trivially, such as Joystick (magazine) [1], AllGame [2], Computer Games Magazine [3], GameSpy [4], Jeuxvideo.com [5]. The game was also covered by PC Gamer [6], but sadly it's a mere rant by the reviewer and nothing can be taken from it except for the Reception section. Overall, Mankind meets WP:GNG, meaning it received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 08:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The sources found by Jovanmilic97 meet the GNG standard in my view. DocFreeman24 (talk) 22:48, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Jovanmilic97. The sources meet the standard at Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources. Shooterwalker (talk) 02:18, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.