Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mailtraq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:33, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mailtraq

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the GNG. My WP:BEFORE search did not find evidence that this software has received significant coverage from multiple independent reliable sources. (Previously deleted via PROD in 2007.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:41, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - article seems promotional, no references to support notability or quality. - Indefensible (talk) 00:39, 29 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable, promotional, and lacking sufficient media coverage. --BoraVoro (talk) 09:31, 3 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG --Devoke water 18:18, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Although I haven't found anything promotional in particular (and this is not a criteria of notability per se), the article doesn't show any sources, which makes it a good candidate for deletion for failing GNG.Onetimememorial (talk) 20:40, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.