Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MagicTracer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:43, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MagicTracer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This piece of paid software does not meet the WP:GNG as it lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Does not meet WP:NSOFT either, although that is just an essay. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 01:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Schützenpanzer (Talk) 01:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My search has led me to finding only download links, so subject fails WP:SIGCOV Vorann Gencov (talk) 22:15, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:46, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom. Fails GNG. Probably would've marked this for A7 if it wasn't so old. C F A 💬 01:16, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Cnet and the usual download links are all that pop up. Non-notable software, seems to no longer bu supported, so we likely won't find any new reviews or the like. Oaktree b (talk) 01:28, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.